Isn’t it
odd that just when you are feeling really good about the work that you do,
someone else comes along and does it way so much better? Crushing, isn’t it?
That is the point where I pick myself off the floor and repeat my mantra:
“There is a market for EVERYTHING”, (including what I do).
Over the
last several weeks, various people kept saying to me, “you should see the
show at the NYC Museum of Art & Design”. People were really taken with
Daniel Brush and his work. When another friend sent me a link to a NY Times
article about his
show, I read the article and was blown away. His work is both sculptural and
jewel-like and is produced solely by himself, a self-taught goldsmith. This guy taught himself
to do granulation, for god’s sake. The pictures of him in his studio with
ancient, Victorian machinery that he single-handedly restored was awesome.
Also, the article stated that he rarely leaves his studio on 23rd St. and doesn’t sell his work through any store, gallery or
agent. He just works: Quietly and for many years on a single piece. And did I
mention the pieces he creates? Jars of steel with high-karat gold inlay.
Granulation. Pave-set 17th century rose-cut diamonds in
“drawings” made of steel. Bake-lite whimsical jewelry with beautiful and
precious pave elements. Some pieces are not jewelry at all but feature layers
of blued steel with high-karat gold and granulated tiny butterflies or bees.
These pieces are more like follies because they incorporate tiny magnets for an
interactive puzzle of re-arrangement possibilities.
Several
days prior to the show’s closing, I found myself in the midst of his massive
show at the museum. Each piece was more detailed and beautiful than the next.
There was a room full of his sculptural “jewelry”, a room full of shadowbox
“sculpture” and a room full of textural line drawings. I have no idea how he
made any of it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee4b2/ee4b24c0dc28719d7ab1d3b39f17d11bb7e8a66a" alt=""
It was
also interesting to note that his wife was there. She was a smallish woman with
long blond hair and very sad eyes. I noticed that she he had her left wrist in
a cast when she slipped quietly away from the crowd. I wondered what her
experience was like, living with a partner who worked incessantly and
apparently took himself incredibly seriously and had enormous pride that one
could interpret as monumental ego.
My
experience speaking with Daniel Brush was that of a true admirer. I was
impressed with his IQ and tenacity. I was inspired by the manifestation of work
so beautiful that it belonged (and is) in the Smithsonian. He mentioned that he
has about 10 collectors who purchase his work and this is what has kept him
afloat for these past 30 years.
I could
not help but question the inherent rights of the male sex, however. The love of
a good woman, keeping him afloat in lean times and mostly running a home while
the genius creates. The unnecessary “burden of proof” that accompanies the
god-given trust-worthy and capable male species. Talent is not random, it is
perfected. But luck and support CAN be quite random.
Oh well,
back to the studio and the drawing board. I need to create my own little
masterpieces of genius. I just wish I had three years to work uninterruptedly
on a single piece and not worry about when I last ate, or how to pay the
mortgage. Time to sweep the floor, or get up off of it.